

I heard George Will on the radio the other day promoting his
new book,
A Nice Little Place on the North Side: Wrigley Field at One Hundred,
which I have not yet read.
Will
also has another baseball tome,
Men at Work, which is a revealing look at the
inner workings of our national pastime.
Will knows baseball and I suspect this latest foray into the
game is more personal and reflective.
Still, I had a problem with the thoughts he had regarding
the retirement of Bud Selig. Will
had nothing but praise for the man I consider to have come up with some really
dumb ideas for baseball.
In short, I don’t like Bud Selig. Not from the start. The owners booted Fay Vincent out of the
Commissioner’s office in 1992.
Then, in a classic example of putting the fox in charge of the hen
house, named Selig, then owner of the Milwaukee Brewers, to be in charge of
baseball. True his title of
Commissioner didn’t become permanent until 1998, but the role of Commissioner
is supposed to guard the best interests of baseball. I believe Selig has only guarded the best interests of the
owners.
Just two years into his tenure, Selig was unable to prevent
a baseball strike. I suggest that
holding firm against the Player’s Association had nothing to do with the best
interests of the game.
He combined the American League and National League
ostensibly to have the rules uniform throughout the game, yet did nothing to
eliminate the designated hitter rule that only serves to lengthen careers of
players who otherwise would have been off the field. Paul Molitor would have never got 3000 hits had not his
career been artificially extended as a DH. I admire Robin Yount’s achievement of that batting benchmark far
more because he also played the game on the field for his entire career with the
Brewers and didn’t spend the vast majority of time sitting on the bench.
Will cited a number of other supposed achievements of
Selig’s reign:
1. The wild card and expansion of the wild card. This has basically eliminated the
meaning of the pennant race.
Hockey and basketball regular seasons are basically meaningless now
because so many teams make the playoffs.
It dilutes the game’s
essence of the best meeting the best in the World Series.
2. Interleague play. This, more than the wild card, has eliminated the level
playing field of all teams in the game.
While it will be nice to see one of the great Yankees, Derek Jeter, play
at Wrigley in his final season, interleague play has totally eliminated the
balanced schedule of each team playing the same teams the same number of
times. It gives an advantage to
some teams and an unfair advantage to others. Adding American League games to the National League schedule
means that any given team now has fewer opportunities to beat the teams they
actually have to beat to get into the playoffs via the dumb wild-card
system. Under the balanced
scheduled, each team would face teams within their division the same number of
away games and home games. They
would also face teams in other divisions the same number of home and away games,
albeit fewer. Under the balanced
schedule divisional teams would face each other 18 times, nine at home, nine
away. Teams faced teams in other divisions
12 games, six and six.
Now with interleague games, the schedule is convoluted. For example in the 2014 season, the
Cubs and Brewers face each other 19 times. The Cubs, however, have ten home games to the Brewers’
nine. The Cubs face the Yankees
four times, two at home. The
Brewers face the Yankees three times, all of which are at home. The Cubs play the White Sox four times
while the Brewers never face them at all.
The real benefit to interleague play is not that fans get to see players. Rather it is that the owners get to make these "marquee" games and jack up ticket prices. In the case of the Cubs versus the Yankees at Wrigley, for example, bleacher seats cost $72 for the night game. Those same seats cost $19 dollars for a night game with the Arizona Diamond Backs.
3. Revenue sharing.
The idea behind revenue sharing is to allow small market teams to
compete monetarily with large market teams like the Yankees.
It seems that everybody thinks the
Yankees bought all those World Series titles, and they did indeed have, and
continue to have, the highest payroll in the majors.
But high payrolls don’t bring titles. During the first
decade of the 2000’s the Cubs ranked in the top five for payrolls, and we can
see how successful they’ve been.
The jury is still out on how much money plays a roll in winning championships.
4. Over twenty new stadiums in the majors. When Selig was still owner of the
Brewers, he wanted to build a new stadium to replace County Stadium, which
opened in 1953, and promised that the only cost to taxpayers would be for
infrastructure, namely roads and water.
In 2000 Miller Park opened to the tune of 450 million taxpayer
dollars. In 2014 the stadium sales
tax that paid for the millionaire’s playground was supposed to end. It hasn’t.
Professional sports teams use two tactics to get local
governments to dig into taxpayer pockets to foot the bill for their
buildings.
The first is the
opposite of the line from
Field of Dreams.
Instead owners say, “If you don’t build it, we will leave.”
The second tactic is more
insidious.
The claim is always
made about some economic benefit to the community that somehow is attached to
having a professional sports team.
More and more studies have shown that that is more than a sham and borders on a flat out lie.
Will also praised Selig for a number of other things
including the new instituted instant replay rules. I don’t like that either.
I will, however, buy Will’s book and read it. I just wish he would stop schilling for
Fox News and the worst Commissioner in history.