Me, Dad, and Ali. A Moment in time

Newspapers, magazines, and web sites ad infinitum have published thousands, maybe hundred of thousands words about Muhammed Ali.

All of those words, the praise, and in some cases the condemnation, about Ali discuss his history, his radicalism, his brashness, his courage, his faith, and of course his skill at boxing.

People recall meeting him, his doodling on table cloths and napkins at fancy soirees, the general feeling of kindness and goodness he generated just by walking into a room.

Countless stories, countless words.  All about a man who, at one time, was the most recognized person on the face of the Earth.  

Ali certainly had his flaws.  Married several times and had several mistresses.  Ali certainly had his greatness, too.  Standing by his faith's beliefs and refusing to enter the military.  Those fights against Frazier.

I could, I suppose, add to those hundreds of thousands of words, about Ali, but I didn't know him.  I never met him.  My knowledge of him is limited to the same hundreds of thousands of words written about him during his lifetime, pretty much the same visceral knowledge of him that everyone of people my age had.

I don't remember him winning an Olympic gold medal.  I was still at St. Stan's grade school in Chicago, playing summer pickup baseball games at Hanson Park or standing in line waiting to to get into the pool at Blackhawk Park.  I knew who Floyd Patterson was and cheered when he regained the heavyweight championship from Ingemar Johansson.  I never liked Sonny Liston because he beat Patterson.

Then came Cassius Clay.  I was in high school by the time he fought Liston.  My classmates thought Liston would get kick Clay's ass handily.  I confess, I thought so as well.  Shows how much I know about pugilism then and now.  Then Clay converted to Islam, changed his name to Ali, and kicked Liston's ass a second time, and this black rhyming boxer who predicted the rounds of his victories became a household word and fixated himself in our collective mind.

Off all the boxers of that time, I thought Patterson was one who could beat Ali.  He didn't, and although I had rooted for Patterson, there was something about Ali that stuck with me.  The simple fact is that I admired him.  

He was fast, so fast he could, like Cool Papa Bell of the Negro Leagues, turn off the lights and get in bed before it got dark.  He danced, shuffled, and jabbed his way around the ring like no heavyweight before or, frankly, since.  More importantly, when he stood up and refused military service, he became a focal point of the war in Vietnam and the draft.

We all know the history of how the boxing world stripped him of his title because of his stand.  Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled that Ali indeed was a conscientious objector.  To his credit, Ali never blamed his detractors nor those who tried to stifle him.   They took three years of his athletic prime from him.  “[…] They only did what they thought was right at the time. I did what I thought was right. That was all. I can’t condemn them for doing what they think was right,” he said.

I think it was then that I, a conscientious objector myself, truly began to admire the man.  

My dad knew this, too.  

He still watched boxing albeit with a somewhat dispassionate attention.  Boxing wasn’t in the Floyd Merriweather era of pay per view ripoffs then.  It was no longer the Gillette Friday Nights at the Fights weekly broadcast, but the big fights, particularly the heavyweight championships were broadcast live on the radio and occasionally on television.  If it wasn’t available on live television, one would just have to wait a week or two to see all the action on ABC’s Wide World or Sports.  

I watched them all.  His defeat against Ken Norton because he couldn’t really figure out a southpaw.  Those two fights against Frazier were brutal.  The rope a dope victory against George Forman.  The thriller in Manilla where Ali remarked afterwards, “I now know what death is like.”

When he lost to Leon Spinks, Ali was overweight and out of shape, a tribute to the adage of never underestimate your opponent.  Six months later, at the New Orleans Superdome, Ali and Spinks fought a second time.  I watched both those fights.  So did my dad.

That second Spinks fight was effectively his last.  He fought two more times and lost to Larry Holmes and Trevor Berbick.  But that last fight with Spinks, he danced, he shuffled, he jabbed.  He looked like, well, Ali.  He won the unanimous 15 round decision.  

ABC, in a well planned moment played, Bob Dylan singing “Forever Young.”

And then the phone rang.  It was my dad.  My dad never really liked talking to people on the phone.  Whenever I called home, he would answer.  I’d ask him how he was doing.  He’d always say, “Fine.  Here’s your mother.”  But this time he called me.  

He knew I was watching.  He knew why Ali was important to me.  He said, “Ali looked good tonight.  He looked really good.”  I half expected him to say, “Here’s your mother,” but he didn’t.  There was a moment of silence and he said, “I just wanted you to know that.”  Then he hung up.

In that one moment I knew that my Dad understood me and I understood him.  

I never met Ali, never had to.  But he was important to me in the very real sense of helping a young man connect with his father in the only way fathers and sons really can.

I'm not flying the French flag for a reason

In January of this year, the offices of  Charlie Hebdo, a satirical newspaper in Paris, came under attack by a small group of Islamic terrorists.  Twelve members of the staff dead.  Several others, including police officers, wounded.  The world reacted with rallies of support.  

Other newspapers and magazines published editorials condemning the attack, not only as an act of terror, but also as an attack on freedom of the press, sort of a self-serving "there but for the grace of God, go I" reaction on the media's part.  If a weekly publication with relatively small circulation can suffer the consequences of printing something, what might happen to a publication with a larger audience?

When Islamic terrorists killed those twelve in the offices of Charlie Hebdo, the social media world showed their support with the phrase "Je Suis Charlie."  That's "I am Charlie" to the French impaired among you.  Thousands, in public rallies around the world, carried placards with the phrase.  Candles were lit. Songs were sung.  All in support of a magazine that probably very few people even knew existed.  

The social media reaction to the recent terrorism in Paris is similar with the temporary profile images of the French flag that sprouted up overnight.  It is perhaps, indicative of our own fleeting attention spans that these profile pictures are labeled as temporary.  

A video of someone playing John Lennon's "Imagine" has gone viral.  It's appeared on social media sites and national news broadcasts.  Candles are lit. Songs are sung. It's the same repetitive reaction.

In September, 2013, Islamic terrorists killed 67 and wounded 175 when they attacked the Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya.  On April 2 of this year, the same group (al-Shabaab) killed 147 and wounded scores at Garissa University, also in Kenya.  

While the news media here did indeed cover the Kenyan stories, the attacks did not warrant wall to wall coverage of the 24 hour cable networks.  They saw no need for constant "expert" analysis of the events. They saw no need for countless interviews with politicians and first hand witness accounts.  They saw no need to show the same film clips over and over and over and drag out the coverage for at least a few days if not a week.  That's what the media does when it has something it deems a big news item.  You can always tell the media is winding down a story in the cycle when a channel's reporter is interviewing another channel's reporter.

For the horrific nature of the same type of terror, where was the world-wide show of support?  The temporary profile picture changes, the lighted candle ceremonies, the viral videos?

I suspect that most of you who read this don't even know these Kenyan massacres occurred let alone remember them.  I'm not faulting you.  I forgot them myself until somebody pointed them out to me.  I didn't change my Facebook profile picture with the French flag transparently over my face.   I didn't, obviously, do it with a Kenyan flag either.  

What does it say about me that I forgot about the two incidents in Kenya?  What does it say about the rest of us, as a people and nation, that our outrage was neither  heard nor expressed on the social media sites as it has been over the Paris events?

In "Meditation 17" by John Donne, he explains exactly why "no man is an island."  It is because, " … any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind."  I believe in those words, and as much as the events in Paris sadden me, I am also saddened that I seemingly forgot them in the case of Kenya's sorrow.  

I can't help but wonder why we pay so much attention to current events in Paris and so little heed to equally horrific events in Africa.   Maybe we're afraid to admit that we don't care what happens there?  Are our attention spans so short?   People lost their lives in Paris.  So, too, in Kenya.  With attention and overt support of Paris we are expressing empathy for their loss.  What are we expressing when say nothing about Kenya?