Friday, June 28, 2024

Misusing Language (a minor rant)

 George Orwell had some advice about writing.

“Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print. Never use a long word where a short one will do. If it is possible to cut a word out always cut it out. Never use the passive voice where you can use the active. Never use a foreign phrase a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.”


It’s easy to find that sentiment expressed in various ways.


Mark Twain, for example, said “Don't use a five-dollar word when a fifty-cent word will do.”


In short the meaning, whether from Orwell, or Twain, or anyone else, is simple.

Don’t use big words when a perfectly good small word says the same thing.

I was on threads and went down a proverbial rabbit hole. A young lady was in a video. Briefly, she was talking about people idolizing a convicted murderer who had a swastika tattoo on his face. She was obvious about her disdain of such behavior and idolatry.

I listened to her and my reaction was, okay, but huh? 


Yeah, whoever she was talking about is a bad, even horrible, person. But I got distracted by her presentation, specifically her use of some words.


She said the guy “unalived two women.” He then tried to “unalive” his girlfriend. He was, according the speaker a “serial unaliver


Later in the video she said he acted “bruthlessly” toward his victims.


Then she lit in on her “mutuals” because they were “commenting things” about the guy and his trial.


According the Oxford English Dictionary, “unalive” is indeed a word. It first appeared in print in 1820 as an adjective. Somehow or another, TikTok and other social media has decided that posts about killing and suicide pose a great threat. To bypass social media censorship people now use the word as a verb and a noun.


Thus to translate what the lady was trying to say, the guy killed two women and tried to murder his girlfriend. And, while no Ted Bundy, the guy by definition is a serial killer.


The woman states at the beginning of the video that she is literally shaking. I owe her mashup of “brutally” and “ruthlessly” into “bruthlessly” to that.


When she mentions her “mutuals” I am assuming she means her friends or followers on social media and not mutual funds that she may be invested in.


I don’t know what her friends were saying, but people say things, they don’t comment things as far as I know.

Language changes over time in meaning and usage. New words come in and old words fade out. Nobody knew what an “astronaut” was until it was first used to describe a person in space. I don’t know if anybody still owns an “icebox” to store food in their kitchen. There are many similar words nobody uses much anymore, if at all.


Sometimes, though, when a reader or listener gets distracted by words that are not familiar or simply don’t make sense, communication is lost.

To the use a small word rule, I’d add don’t make stuff up.


Saturday, June 22, 2024

Which Side Are You On? (It's time to decide)

 


Florence Reece wrote Which Side Are You On? in 1931 about the Coal Wars in Kentucky. It’s a union song made popular by the Weavers and Pete Seeger. It’s been recorded by numerous artists over the years.


Sometimes the words are changed, as in Billy Bragg’s version, mainly to fit the times or circumstances. That’s the nature of folk music.

One newer version of the song is by S.G. Goodman, a Kentucky woman herself like Reece. She relates the song to her place in the world, and, in effect, our place, too.

The question as important as ever. It’s time for us to choose, as a nation, and perhaps more importantly as individuals.

As a voter I have to decide. Do I want the country I love to be led by a man who is the antithesis to what I believe in?

To me the choice is clear. And logical.

The economy is doing well. The stock market is at record highs. Unemployment is at record lows. Millions of new jobs have been added. Wages are now outpacing the inflation rate. Infrastructure is being built and repaired. If I were diabetic, I’d be paying only 35 bucks for insulin. As a senior, my out of pocket medication costs are capped at 2000 dollars.

In short, the current guy is getting stuff done.

Yes, Biden is old, older than I am. So is the other guy. Yes, Biden is slow of gait and sometimes stumbles over words. Have you heard the word salad come out of the other guy’s mouth?

Like it or not, we have a two party system.

Like it or not, unless something happens, either Joe Biden or Donald Trump will be President for the next four years.

The chances of a third party candidate winning enough votes, let alone the electoral college, are slim and none. Psst. Slim left town a long time ago.

Regardless, some people will still cast their ballot for Kennedy’s kid or some faux libertarian candidate. Some will not vote at all. I submit that any such vote or lack of vote will lead to Trump’s winning the Presidency.

Trump and the Republican party want the following;

  • Take away women’s right to control their own bodies

  • Make it harder to vote

  • Lower taxes for the rich

  • Project 2025 to create an autocracy

  • A government mandated religion

  • Elimination of several federal agencies

  • Elimination of Climate Controls

I get that some people don’t like Biden. I’m not happy with everything he’s done or not done. No President is perfect. No President can do everything he (or hopefully one day she) had promised. A decent President at least tries to get things done. A decent President gets done the stuff that can get done.

I already mentioned some things that the current guy has gotten done. He is still trying to get more done.

It Biden doesn’t win, Trump and his self-indulgent autocratic view of the world will be in power.

I have to ask. Is that what you want? Which Side Are You On? Really?